"Digital twins" have been all the rage over the past three years - reaching Gartner's peak of inflated expectations in 2018.
While people usually think of digital twins in the context of IoT, we believe that industrial buyers of raw materials and energy can greatly benefit from procurement-specific digital twins.
Although, as mentioned above, digital twins have mainly been used for IoT applications thus far, their definition is quite generic:
A digital twin is enterprise software that implements a virtual representation of a connected entity or process, used to provide situation awareness that helps improve business decision making and outcomes." - Gartner
Four components define a digital twin:
Here is a classic example:
Such digital twins have two primary roles:
So what would a digital twin for raw material and energy buyers look like?
Basically, a lot like a classic IoT digital twin. The goal is still to "implement a virtual representation of a connected process", "provide situational awareness" and "improve business decision-making and outcomes".
There are, though, a few notable differences, as summarized below:
Datapred's digital twin for industrial buyers of raw materials and energy is based on the combination of:
Both engines work continuously together to deliver insights and provide buying recommendations to industrial buyers, as illustrated below:
We believe that combining predictive models with optimization models that integrate the true "costs and constraints" of buyers is a very effective way to replicate their real-life decision-making process.
A digital twin brings four significant benefits to industrial buyers of raw materials and energy.
The integration of internal (operational) and external (market) data is key for procurement digital twins, because industrial raw material buyers have always combined market knowledge and industry expertise.
Replicating that mental model brings confidence and facilitates the set up and continuous enrichment of the procurement digital twin.
Market analyses without cost/constraint integration remain descriptive. Not that descriptions are necessarily crude or boring. But they leave the crucial "so what" question open, and can't as a consequence be genuine game changers.
Combining descriptions and predictions on the one hand, with decision models (like Datapred's cost/constraint optimization) on the other hand, is the only way to turn analyses into actionable insights.
Most industrial companies agree that faced with increased market liquidity and volatility, raw material and energy buyers will need more reactivity in the coming years.
However, leaving the well-trodden territory of term-based contracts and experimenting with new procurement tactics is daunting when hundreds of millions in annual spend are at play.
Digital twins are ideal for playing with costs, constraints and business rules, and assessing the potential impact of new buying strategies, using what-il scenarios.
They can also help buyers stress-test their exposure to raw material and energy price drivers. For example, if oil prices rise by 15% over the next quarter, what is the likely impact on polyethylene prices?
Large corporations are not suffering from a lack of internal data and - in our experience - tend to overstress about data quality, and overestimate the hardware investments required for data analysis.
What they are not doing well yet (at least formally), is to analyze that internal data in the context of relevant market dynamics.
Such joint internal/external analyses are a great benefit of procurement digital twins, and unlock unique and valuable insights. For example: What is the correlation between historical market prices and the prices we have been paying? Is our bargaining power affected by specific market forces? Can we predict that bargaining power?
***
Implementing digital twins will be a key aspect of Procurement's digital transformation, with raw material and energy buyers at the forefront of that exciting trend. Don't hesitate to contact us to discuss how Datapred can help.